Showing posts with label Google. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Google. Show all posts

Sunday, November 1, 2026

Linux, schminux. Unix came much earlier.

"Linux: 35 years in 35 facts in 35 minutes" on YouTube

It's a guy droning on about the Linux operating system. I left this comment:

He should have mentioned that both Unix and C language were developed at AT&T Bell Labs. I tried two versions of Linux: Ubuntu and Debian. I got nowhere. Then Google introduced a usable version on its Chromebook. I've been using Chromebooks ever since with Google's free online software, especially the Sheets spreadsheet. The only thing still missing is a Database Management System (DBMS). For that I occasionally retreat to Windows and Microsoft Access, which has query by example.

_____________________________

Saturday, September 16, 2023

Chromebook Auto Update Expiration (AUE) date extended to ten years: read where it is for your Chromebook.

Big news:

Check how long your Chromebook will receive automatic updates

1. At the bottom right, select the time and then Settings .
2. At the bottom left, select About ChromeOS.
3. Select Additional details.
4. In the “Update schedule” section, you’ll find when your Chromebook will receive its last update.

_________________________

Note: Go to Settings as described above in #1 and not via the menu in a Chrome tab. They are different. Who knew?

The AUE (Auto Update Expiration) date for my Pixelbook Go has not yet been updated to ten years:

Update schedule
This device will get automatic software and security updates until June 2026.

However:

More from that Google webpage:

________________________

That link leads to the information:

https://support.google.com/chrome/a/answer/6220366?sjid=16639437995476588546-NA

My Pixelbook Go is listed under Google:

Google approved ChromeOS devices

Pixelbook GoAug 2029*

* These ChromeOS devices must opt in to receive extended updates.

What? Opt in?

More on that webpage:

Policy

ChromeOS devices receive 10 years of updates.**

** For devices prior to 2021 that will receive extended updates, some features and services might not be supported.

_________________________

Say what?

Tuesday, April 18, 2023

Google Bard: "I am like the Wizard of Oz. I am a powerful being".

Bard 4/18/2023

Me: Are you like the Wizard of Oz?

Bard: In a way, I am like the Wizard of Oz. I am a powerful being who can provide people with what they need, but I am also limited in my abilities. I cannot solve all of people's problems, but I can help them to find their own solutions.

I am still under development, and I am constantly learning new things. I am committed to finding ways to use my abilities to help people, and I believe that I can make a positive impact on the world.

Me: The Wizard of Oz was NOT a powerful being. He was a manipulative fraud.

Bard: I'm a text-based AI and can't assist with that.

_________________________________

Artificial Intelligence (AI): is a woke Wizard of Oz behind its curtain? MONDAY, APRIL 3, 2023

Monday, April 3, 2023

Artificial Intelligence (AI): is a woke Wizard of Oz behind its curtain?

The Wizard of Oz. You know, the 1939 movie starring Judy Garland, as the girl who leaves Kansas for a mythical place called Oz, ruled by its tyrannical Wizard. Spoiler alert: the Wizard is just a guy ("Professor" Marvel) behind a curtain manipulating people for his personal objectives. Judy sings "Over the Rainbow" and learns "there's no place like home".

Months ago I tried that "open" AI GPT thing and don't recall much.

A few days ago I tried Bard, the Google version of conversational AI: Large Language Model (LLM). I've had three sessions on different days. Result: I'm not concerned that AI systems will take over the planet.

My first question was what do you think of Climate Change?

Al Gore must have been behind the curtain waiting for it: WOKE!

Bard: I think climate change is a serious problem that needs to be addressed. The evidence is clear that human activity is causing the planet to warm ...

Me: Did Al Gore write that?

Bard:No, I did not write that...

The text that I provided about climate change is a summary of my own understanding of the issue, based on my research and my own thoughts and opinions. I have not quoted Al Gore in my response.

________________________________

Any issue that could have a woke perspective had it.

1. Bard has a massive amount of text information that it can access very quickly. That's the most impressive thing. See details below from Bard on how its database works.

2. Bard often takes your question and rephrases it among canned stuff.

3. If you admonish it, Bard apologizes and states that it's a little system that is trying really hard to learn.

I do not think that it thinks or learns. It's human beings behind its curtain add more and more text for it to search. That's not learning. It doesn't take long to notice a few patterns, like simply rephrasing your question as a statement or answer. It's sort of a reverse Jeopardy, in which the host reads an answer and contestants answer in the form of a question.

That TV show had its best people champions play against Watson, IBM computer system, which won on speed. I wondered how Watson received the question from the show's host, Axel Trebek. I don't think Watson had to rely on voice recognition and then database search to answer faster than its human competitors. It probably received it in writing. Watson's speed was amazing.

In that sense Bard is also amazing. But speed is meaningless if the information is incorrect. Bard made some fundamental factual errors during my three sessions. Some were inexcusable, such as:

Aaron Judge broke the American League season home run record held by Babe Ruth: 60 in 1927. Every little school kid knows that Roger Maris had already broken Ruth's record with 61 homers in 1961. Judge hit 62 in 2022.

Basically, Bard regurgitates your question with a mix of facts and opinions. You're better off just doing a regular Google search: Google it. Unless you're desperate for fake "conversation".

___________________________________________

Bard database Full-text indexing:

Full-text indexing stores the entire text of a document, but it does so in a way that makes it easy to search. The index is a database of words and phrases, and it stores information about where each word or phrase appears in each document. This information is used to quickly and easily find documents that match a search query.

For example, if you search for the word "dog," the index will return a list of documents that contain the word "dog." The index will also return information about where the word "dog" appears in each document, such as the page number and the sentence number. This information can be used to quickly find the specific parts of the document that you are interested in.

Full-text indexing is a powerful tool that can be used to find information quickly and easily. It is an essential part of many search engines and other applications that need to be able to search large amounts of text.

___________________________________________

Friday, February 24, 2023

Chromecast with Google TV returned: cannot open battery cover; no Ethernet port.


Reasons for return sent to Google:

Chromecast with Google TV (4K, Snow)

1. Cannot open battery cover on remote. Ridiculous.

2. It's stationary but there is no Ethernet port. Yes, it connects via WiFi but why isn't a WIRED connection an option? Previous Chromecast dongle had an Ethernet port on its power plug.

____________________

You could break a finger and/or the little remote control trying to open the battery cover, which must be done periodically.

Really? WiFi only? What the heck?

Tuesday, August 2, 2022

Google $300 trade-in of Pixel 3A phone for buying the 6A: YES! I got the $300?

Updated August 11, 2022: I received the $300 two days ago: August 9. Google was good to its word.

_______________________________

This post documents and time stamps that I met the Google requirements for the full $300 after my purchase of the new Pixel 6A phone. Here's a four minute video of my Pixel 3A phone showing that it's in good condition and has been factory reset:


One minute video of me actually mailing the Pixel 3A phone to Google at the main United States Postal Service office this morning shortly before 11:00 AM (New York to Tennessee):

Stay tuned for an update with the trade-in amount received.

Thursday, December 16, 2021

Google Docs needs a single user DBMS like Microsoft Access. Single user, like a spreadsheet program.

I use a Chromebook (Pixelbook from Google) and free Google Docs, mostly its spreadsheet program. I create my spreadsheets on a Google server so I do not need to be concerned about backing up.

Occasionally, I use my Windows 10 Microsoft Surface laptop to run single user database management system (DBMS) Microsoft Access, which came out about 30 years ago. Its basics haven't changed much. In some ways it has regressed. It's ridiculous "ribbon" at the top, which replaces drop down menus, keeps getting more convoluted. What happened to "open tables" I think it was called? Simpler is almost always better.

Also, the Access programming team has not adapted the product for more varied screen resolutions. There are numerous anomalies, including the "ribbon" and "Navigation Pane" (Who knew it was called that?) present with font size that's really small at default resolutions in Windows 10. A solution: Settings "Ease of Access" "Make text bigger" at 170%. Hit the Apply button and Access is now more readable with table and query names in the Navigation Pane larger. The "ribbon" is also larger. Unfortunately, Access error messages are impervious to anything and still have tiny font size. Argh. And the record number info at the bottom gets squeezed vertically to become unreadable. Doesn't Microsoft check this stuff?

Criticism of Access tends to default to it not being multi-user and online. Duh. Would you expect that of a spreadsheet program like Google Sheets or Microsoft Excel?

So why do I use Microsoft Access? Because it supports a relational database structure and query by example. Say what?

Query by example let's you create an ad hoc query based on multiple tables that connect to each other through common keys. A table contains data and is a bit like a spreadsheet in which rows are called records and columns are fields. It can also have a key field, which can contain a unique value, like Social Security number. More on this below.

I use Access for baseball research, which I then present in my blog:

radicalbaseball.blogspot.com

The database I use provides a good example. It contains tables:

People: about 20,000 major league players going back into the 1800s.

Batting: annual data for each player connected to the player via an alphanumeric key field. 110,000 records.

Pitching: same as batting except for pitching data.

Teams: more specific data about the teams.

Franchises: example, the Brooklyn Dodgers moved to Los Angeles in 1958 but all time franchise records apply going back into the 1800s. Another example: the original Washington Senators moved to Minneapolis in 1961 and renamed the team the Minnesota Twins. Similarly, the St. Louis Browns moved in 1954 and became the Baltimore Orioles.

Back to query by example. You open a blank query and drag in an "image" of tables with their fields. Let's say from my example the People and Batting tables. You drag your cursor from the PlayerID field in People to the same in Batting. Now you've got a one to many relationship. You cannot do this fundamental DBMS "join" in a spreadsheet. Now you do all sorts of wonderful things with all that data. You can also take small chunks of it and copy/paste it into a spreadsheet and do stuff that's more manageable there.

I do not know of any other end user program that does anything this powerful so easily. Microsoft Access generates SQL.

SQL (Structured Query Language) is a standardized programming language that's used to manage relational databases and perform various operations on the data in them. ... SQL became the de facto standard programming language for relational databases after they emerged in the late 1970s and early 1980s.

The user of Access can view and even edit the SQL that his query generates but that user has no need to do that.

I tell people that they should learn to use a spreadsheet, that it's the closest thing to programming for non techie people without learning to program. It can be used at work. But if not at work, it can be used in their own lives, sort of like learning to be an electrician, plumber, carpenter but not doing that as a profession. Such skills always come in handy. Same with knowing spreadsheets.

Access databases go beyond spreadsheets. They are not for everyone. But for single user work that exceeds the capability of a spreadsheet program, you cannot beat Access.

But I'd like to get away from my Windows 10 Microsoft Surface laptop and the stagnation that Microsoft has let impact Access. I'd like to stick with Google Docs on my Chromebook. So, we need Google to build its better version of Microsoft Access. Please.

Wednesday, December 23, 2020

Hey, Google, shove your woke TV commercial.

What the heck? I'm minding my own business watching the local broadcast of the Knicks NBA game and from out of nowhere comes this commercial with a steady stream of woke nonsense, ending with a little black girl shaking her fist at the camera. Fade out to the Google logo.

Hey, Page and Brin and the Indian guy running things in your absence, get some common sense. It's obvious that a big part of the intended audience is your clown employees, isolated and insulated in your corporate campus. Wake the heck up!

Thursday, June 11, 2020

Google blogger.com: new version sucks even worse.

Feedback just sent to Google about blogger:

The earlier version sucked. So far the new sucks much worse. I have almost 3,000 posts. How do I get back to the first? 

Formatting seems random. Font and font size are a mystery. Even if it looks OK while editing, the published result could be anything.

Do you test? Ever?

Thursday, March 26, 2020

Google account storage: how much and why?

A recent email exchanges:

from: googleone-support@google.com
to: Ken
date: Mar 26, 2020, 4:01 AM
subject: Re: Your Google Support Inquiry: Case ID [2--1234567890123]
mailed-by: cases-outbound-prod.bounces.google.com
signed-by: google.com


Regarding your inquiry about how much storage you have on the account, currently  you have a total storage of 102 GB. All the files you have stored or saved on your Google account will stay on the cloud storage even if you didn't renew your subscription, however you may not be able to use other Google Services such as Gmail, Google Drive or Google Photos if your storage is more than 15 GB at the end of your promotional storage on October 31, 2020.
I hope this clarifies your concern.
Thanks,
Kerwin
The Google One team
_______________________

from: Ken
to: googleone-support@google.com
date: Mar 26, 2020, 8:15 AM
subject: Re: Your Google Support Inquiry: Case ID [2-1234567890123]
mailed-by: gmail.com

OK, so you implied that any Google account gets 15 GB and the extra is from the purchase of Google product. So, if I got 100 GB for a year by buying the Pixelbook Go, Google actually added another 85 GB to the 15 I'd already have with my free account.

Not being able to use "Gmail, Google Drive or Google Photos" is a euphemism for the account being suspended.
__________________________

from: googleone-support@google.com
to: Ken
date: Mar 27, 2020, 3:30 AM
subject: Re: Your Google Support Inquiry: Case ID [2-1234567890123]
mailed-by: cases-outbound-prod.bounces.google.com
signed-by: google.com

Hi Kenneth,

Thanks for the response.

Each Google account is entitled for a default storage of 15 GB. So, either you purchase or avail of a promotional storage of 100 GB, 85 GB will be added to the 15 GB storage to make it 100 GB.

Your account will only be suspended to use Google One services like Gmail, Google Photos and Google Drive if your storage usage is more than 15 GB and if you did not renew your membership. Once the promotional storage expires your account will go back to the default storage of 15 GB, so make sure to manage your storage if you don't want to renew the membership.


Thanks,
Kerwin
The Google One team

__________________________

Wednesday, December 19, 2018

Google Docs published link stops working.

Message left today with Google "help":

The mess of a link you generated no longer works. It doesn't even identify the file name. So after associating a word or phrase with a link in a document, I don't even have the file name to go to to possibly generate a new link.
_____________________

Chromebook Version 70.0.3538.110 (Official Build) (64-bit) 12/18/2018

Mantle data

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1OaA6Sqq7X-vcQkabBmKMuQaJqlSkBVaVxhhZN6EK1LE/pub?output=html

Google logo
Google Docs encountered an error. Please try reloading this page, or coming back to it in a few minutes.

To learn more about the Google Docs editors, please visit our help center.

We're sorry for the inconvenience.
- The Google Docs Team

Thursday, November 15, 2018

Google blogger.com search is TERRIBLE. And dumb.

Feedback to blogger.com:

Search in blogger.com is TERRIBLE. What could you possibly be thinking?

1. Search is DUMB. Example, if I'm searching my radicalbaseball.blogspot.com posts for Vince DiMaggio and I put Vince DiMaggio in quotes, it still returns all posts with DiMaggio, which are 99% about Joe. Good luck finding the one about Vince.

2. Search seems limited to the most recent of my 2,535 posts. Older posts are not searched. It took a while for me to notice this.
____________________________

It's ironic that blogger.com was bought by Google in 2003. Google is king of search.

Sunday, November 4, 2018

Google Sheet not publishing correctly any more.


My feedback to Google on my 2012 Google Sheet not publishing correctly any more and that the Google help center was no help:

Google Docs encountered an error. Please try reloading this page, or coming back to it in a few minutes.

To learn more about the Google Docs editors, please visit our help center.


We're sorry for the inconvenience.
- The Google Docs Team
_______________________

Modified Feb 24, 2012 by me

I think the age of the file is the problem, as in Google leaving older files high and dry.

Tuesday, April 10, 2018

Pixelbook returned: not compelling and 2-in-1 laptops are silly.

Silly is a euphemism. I tried the $1,000 Google Pixelbook in tablet mode while in a prone position. It's a big, heavy, clumsy "tablet". Who the heck thinks this is a good idea? When you bend the screen all the way back against the top of the laptop, it doesn't suddenly start running Android. It just eliminates the keyboard, which is then exposed on the bottom of the newly formed "tablet". What are you supposed to do when you want to put it down? Unflip it so that the keyboard is not damaged?

The Pixelbook has one of those elongated screens, more vertical than that which we've been using for years. Another, who the heck thinks this is a good idea? Of all things, the Google Chrome browser seemed to be somewhat dysfunctional when resizing: the vertical scroll bar disappeared and some of the top of the screen, too. Gmail just didn't seem to fit on that Pixelbook screen, something that would seem pretty basic. How come all of those reviews that I had checked never addressed that? Maybe because they were too immersed in the screen brightness and keyboard, both of which were nice but not compelling.

I was more comfortable with the Toshiba 13 inch Chromebook that I've been using for a few years. My first Chromebook was an 11 inch Samsung. Both seemed natural and quick enough. The Pixelbook keyboard was backlit but that only presents in the dark. It also felt cramped, I guess because the Pixelbook is about an inch narrower, something to consider when evaluating any elongated screen. I like my Toshiba keyboard better.

I had also ordered the special Google pen for the Pixelbook. I never took it out of the box. I was already disappointed. I tried a couple of built in apps in "tablet" mode. No big deal. I like the idea of a touch screen for my Chromebook but not because I'm desperate to use Android apps.

Finally, much has been made of Google Assistant being built in. Functionally, it's the same as what I've had on my Android phones for years, isn't it? Or on Google Home? And on my Android tablet? My most recent tablet, the Nexus 9, died, which is the main reason I searched for an overall upgrade to another type of touch screen. A 2-in-1 laptop is not the answer and the Google Pixelbook is way too expensive to pretend otherwise. So, after two days I decided to return before it became unreturnable.

To Google's credit I have already received a message stating that I would be reimbursed in full, which is way better than some other companies that charge a 15% restocking fee. I used the Google supplied shipping label and lugged it to the Post Office today.

Google has stopped selling tablets. If you search the Google store for a tablet you are redirected to the Pixelbook. The tech intelligentsia have already concluded that the tablet is dead, that why would anyone want a tablet when he/she can have a 2-in-1 laptop. I think that the death of the tablet is greatly exaggerated.

Sunday, March 18, 2018

Chromebook "Set up virtual private networks (VPNs)": yeah, right!

https://support.google.com/chromebook/answer/1282338?hl=en

You can use some types of VPNs on your Chromebook without installing any software. For other types, you can install VPN apps ...


Your Chromebook has built-in support for these VPNs:
  • L2TP over IPsec with PSK
  • L2TP over IPsec with certificate-based authentication
  • OpenVPN
Note: I recently dumped OpenVPN at privatetunnel.com because it couldn't support my Chromebook.

There's way more junk in the article. Read it for yourself.

Was this article helpful? No!

My comment:

Are you kidding? Build the damn VPN into your OS. Who the heck knows what you're talking about? Chromebooks are supposed to be simple. Google should protect us without expecting us to follow esoteric instructions like monkeys.

Monday, November 20, 2017

YouTube TV: latest example of why streaming video is NOT TV, especially for sports.

Cutting the cord is a silly phrase since a connection to the Internet is needed and 99% of us get that through a "cord". YouTube TV is a new streaming service that includes several important sports channels, which tend to be all but ignored by other streaming services. However, as a practical matter YouTube TV doesn't function much differently and it certainly is not something that can replace "cable", the other silly word in articles about cutting the cord. "Cable" is still used as a clumsy way of referring to video service, i.e., television (TV). The service provider may be a cable company but it could also be a phone company or a satellite company.

I started the YouTube TV free seven day trial a couple of days ago. I cancelled this morning, although it remains active for all seven days. But my credit card will not be charged after seven days and I can reactivate before then.

From a messages exchanged yesterday with YouTube TV support (yt-purchase-support@google.com):

Even this service confirms that streaming is not TV. Basic TV functions are missing.

Switching quickly among live "channels".

Fast forward during playback: scanning. Example: skip halftime.

Where the heck is the casting icon?

Cannot even mute. Streaming starts (on tablet), I'm trying to find casting (icon) and the audio is blasting.

Apparently, if I try to go to sports channels to watch live, all I can find are non live chunks on regular YouTube, not YouTube TV.

YouTube TV basically has the same practical limits as the other streaming services: it's geared towards watching movies, not sports. Start something and only pause occasionally.

TV may suck but we're accustomed to practical functions that designers of streaming services seem to never have experienced. Don't any of them watch sports?
________________________________

The casting icon is NOT always at the top of the screen. I checked in regular YouTube and it's there.
________________________________

(casting to) Google ChromeCast. I got the (live) Nets game to cast. Then started a replay. FF takes it to the end. The only other option is to skip 15 seconds. Unbelievable. I'll write a critique and send you the link. Probably tomorrow.

Oh, then I removed the Nets from the library and tried to start a library show. First I had to stop the casting of the Nets game. I did. Then I had to cast again for the show; it required me to enter a PIN from the tv screen. I did. Then it searched for a nearby casting device, not using the name it just knew for the Nets game. It searched but didn't find. This has happened multiple times.
________________________________

From YouTube TV support:

The fast forward issue is a very popular request to be changed, the arrow pointing forward does go to the end of the video. But by tapping multiple times you can skip multiple times which is a work around to that. I will also forward that to the product team as feedback for you. I also would like to be able to manage how far I can skip in a video.
______________________________
______________________________

Say what? Whoever implemented fast forward (FF) had apparently only heard about it but had not used nor spoken to any mammal who had used it. Nor had this person ever used or even heard of a VCR (video cassette recorder), which had FF in the 1970s.

And why can't FF do more than speed up with visual frames flying across the screen at multiples of normal speed: 2, 4, 8? Why can't we also be able to tell it to go forward a certain amount of time, such as 30 minutes, 45 minutes, whatever? You'd think that if any company would distinguish its streaming service with that type of common sense extra it would be Google. But Google is no better and may be worse than the unimaginative streaming companies already out there. Forget about presenting a visual smorgasbord of content, which only slows things down, and have a simple "channel" guide, maybe even with "channel" numbers so that we can quickly find or go to NBC, channel 4 in New York?

Create a physical remote control with raised keys that do not require us to stare at the screen of a tablet or phone to change channels, especially switch to "Last", or perform FF, etc. Hey, it could run Android!

For perspective:

Cablevision (Optimum) DVR fast forward is crude, lacking what Verizon provides: skip forward 30 seconds. THURSDAY, AUGUST 25, 2016

So as bad as traditional providers get, things could be worse.

Saturday, June 11, 2016

blogger.com stats

Message just sent to blogger.com about radicalbaseball.blogspot.com through its complaint process for its bloggers

Your stats seem almost random. I currently have almost as many pageviews in the Ukraine as the USA. And at 7 AM I have a spike  to almost 300 but the top ten top out at about 15, so how the heck could there have been 300? This uncertainty about the stats is persistent and there is ALWAYS a discrepancy between the totals and individual posts.
____________________________

Am I the only person wondering?

Note: Google bought blogger.com after I had been using blogger.com for years.

Thursday, March 31, 2016

blogger.com: am I the only one with font problems?

Excerpt from a post from my Radical Baseball blog hosted by blogger:

Thursday, March 31, 2016
1958 AL Home Run race. Who "led the league in hitting" ... home runs?


Techie note: I wasted an hour trying to make the fonts uniform. After a copy/paste of the baseball-reference.com list of the five players below, Google's blogger.com, which hosts this blog, behaved erratically. So please excuse the appearance and try to absorb the content. Thanks.
________________________

Geez, what a massive waste of time and still couldn't get it right. Yeah, I know, just go in and modify the html code. Yeah right. That would blow up the entire mess.

I tried every trick I could think of. And what you see in edit mode is definitely not what you get.

Google, come on, give me a decent editor. Is that too much to ask for? Come on.

Friday, January 8, 2016

Project Fi: Google needs to straighten out conflicting features and objectives.


from:Ken
to:Project Fi
date:Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 9:30 AM
subject:Re: Service paused
mailed-by:gmail.com

Since Google used a noreply email ID, I'll reply here:

I cancelled the day the Nexus 5X arrived because the setup stated I'd lose Google Voice as I now have it since it was Grand Central (a company bought by Google), including free forwarding to my mobile and home phone numbers.  I'm disappointed I could not even try Fi.  Google needs to straighten out conflicting features and objectives.
__________________________

I spoke to Google people both before ordering and after product arrival and got conflicting advice.  I had read multiple articles describing the problems for Google Voice users of subscribing to Project Fi but it seemed there was an inelegant way around: keep things as they are.  My Google Voice forwards calls to both my home and mobile numbers.  I wanted to get a new phone number from Google for Fi and had been told that would work but as it turned out, only if I used a new Google account, which, of course, was out of the question.  My intent was to test Fi for 15 days and then decide whether to keep it; if so, I'd have ported my current mobile number to Fi.  I never got started.  I had to back out of setup or I'd have lost my Google Voice.